Is It Necessary to Run the Filter on a Saltwater Tank Continuously
- Home
- Forums
- General Aquarium Discussion
- Reef Aquarium Discussion
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Do you run Carbon?
- Thread starter Reef man 89
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- #1
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2016
- Messages
- 1,889
- Reaction score
- 1,339
- Review score
- +1 /0 /-0
- #2
Disadvantages: A lot of people say it removes "the good stuff", so I hope this doesn't come across personally, I know where you picked up that term and that probably on this forum. Personally I really do not like non-specific statements like that. What is the definition of "good stuff"? In most cases, people are referring to amino acids, or red sea reef energy, or vitamins added to food, or medications, or something that was purposefully added by the reefer. That is the definition we will use here. Using that definition, yes, GAC removes "the good stuff" as well. But the solution for that is simple. Turn off your carbon reactor or take the bag out of the sump every time you add something you think will benefit your tank, at least for as long as you want the good stuff to stay in your tank. So the major disadvantage is more of a PITA thing than a *true* disadvantage. Now you see why a reactor also begins to make more sense. Instead of getting your hand and arm set, it's pulling a plug out of a power strip. Even better is with concomitant use of a controller, such as Neptune Apex, where you can use your cell phone to turn the reactor off while you add your amino acids.
Here is a link to a great basic article that should conclude the post with one exception: GAC as a causative agent for head and lateral line disease (HLLE )
At this point, you should have a good idea of the what, is, how, why, why not and uh-oh of GAC. You have all the information you need, but in case I missed something, I hope that someone comes behind me and adds to the post. There is a bias towards the use of GAC frankly. I use it as well as many other people. There are reactors that exist just for GAC. So there is something really positive about it, you just need to find that out for yourself, and I think running that 1/4 pound would be a great way to start learning. For the amount to run, think along the lines of 2 cups per 50 gallons.
Cheers,
Lloyd
- #3
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2015
- Messages
- 70
- Reaction score
- 17
- Review score
- +0 /0 /-0
- #4
Good rodi,filter socks and protein skimmer are good enough for me
- #5
- #6
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2012
- Messages
- 11,636
- Reaction score
- 1,044
- Review score
- +0 /0 /-0
Lets put it this way.
I used Carbon for Years and had No Coral Growth!
I Stopped Using it and My Corals Took Off
So No I would Never Use Carbon.
The Only Exception Might be in an Emergency Situation.
- Thread Starter
- #7
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2016
- Messages
- 1,889
- Reaction score
- 1,339
- Review score
- +1 /0 /-0
Thank you so much Lloyd for that I have a better understanding of it now. I just have read so many mixed reviews on running Carbon I wanted to get some peoples input on it. I use RSCP salt and just have read that if I run Carbon it takes out the trace elements from the salt. But you have a very good point. Take it off line when dosing the elements.Granular Activated Carbon, or GAC, comes in a few different forms each with varying levels of effectiveness. For the difference between the types of GAC, click here for a BRS video (also check out the associated videos on the right, e.g. "How to Get Pristine Blue Water...". By now, or by watching those videos, you should have 95% of your own answers, but to give you personal answers and what I do is this: I run BRS ROX GAC in a reactor (recommend Spyglass from Avast Marine) pretty frequently. I only turn it off when I'm adding amino acids, foods, even chemicals I want to keep around longer than one pass through the sump.![]()
![]()
The reason is that GAC, and ROX especially are amazingly good at binding whatever they can in the water column and holding on to them. I would recommend running it in a reactor if you want to see maximum effectiveness, however, putting it in a bag in an area of high flow would be effective as well. I do both, one tank is an AIO too small for reactors, so I have a bag in the back, another tank is 135 and can support a reactor, so that's where it is. I am running mine 24/7 at the moment for a specific reason, but how often you run it depends on what you are trying to achieve: if you just want to have much more clear water, running it for 5 days or so every month will suffice. If you are trying to neutralize coral toxins, say, leather coral toxins, then you should run it all the time. There are numerous advantages: crystal clear water, elimination of toxins, from livestock or other sources, removal of organic wastes and heavy metals, removal of organics that can break down into nitrates, and help in keeping water clean for larger sized tanks. That helps keep water changes down so 10% weekly is manageable. It is also super effective if one is using ozone: it removes the ozone molecule, or I should say, neutralizes ozone before it reaches the DT. It also helps neutralize ozone produced oxidants (OPO's) that could be harmful to livestock in the DT when running ozone.
Disadvantages: A lot of people say it removes "the good stuff", so I hope this doesn't come across personally, I know where you picked up that term and that probably on this forum. Personally I really do not like non-specific statements like that. What is the definition of "good stuff"? In most cases, people are referring to amino acids, or red sea reef energy, or vitamins added to food, or medications, or something that was purposefully added by the reefer. That is the definition we will use here. Using that definition, yes, GAC removes "the good stuff" as well. But the solution for that is simple. Turn off your carbon reactor or take the bag out of the sump every time you add something you think will benefit your tank, at least for as long as you want the good stuff to stay in your tank. So the major disadvantage is more of a PITA thing than a *true* disadvantage. Now you see why a reactor also begins to make more sense. Instead of getting your hand and arm set, it's pulling a plug out of a power strip. Even better is with concomitant use of a controller, such as Neptune Apex, where you can use your cell phone to turn the reactor off while you add your amino acids.
Here is a link to a great basic article that should conclude the post with one exception: GAC as a causative agent for head and lateral line disease (HLLE )At this point, you should have a good idea of the what, is, how, why, why not and uh-oh of GAC. You have all the information you need, but in case I missed something, I hope that someone comes behind me and adds to the post. There is a bias towards the use of GAC frankly. I use it as well as many other people. There are reactors that exist just for GAC. So there is something really positive about it, you just need to find that out for yourself, and I think running that 1/4 pound would be a great way to start learning. For the amount to run, think along the lines of 2 cups per 50 gallons.
Cheers,
Lloyd
- Thread Starter
- #8
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2016
- Messages
- 1,889
- Reaction score
- 1,339
- Review score
- +1 /0 /-0
See it's hard when there is so many mix reviews I might just try running it for alittle and see how things goYes, Carbon Pulls Out the Good Stuff in Addition to the Bad Stuff.Lets put it this way.
I used Carbon for Years and had No Coral Growth!
I Stopped Using it and My Corals Took Off
![]()
So No I would Never Use Carbon.
The Only Exception Might be in an Emergency Situation.
- #9
- #10
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2016
- Messages
- 448
- Reaction score
- 329
- Review score
- +0 /0 /-0
I don't use GAC unless I have an issue that dictates I temporarily run GAC, like when I just peeled some zoas off my rock work because they are expanding their territory too much.
- #11
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,026
- Reaction score
- 736
- Review score
- +0 /0 /-0
https://www.reef2reef.com/threads/running-gfo-carbon.147756/page-2
Personally I only run carbon because I over feed.i don't use gfo but I do run phosguard as i hit a crazy high phosphate cycle on my 4th month. From what I've heard phosguard is good and does the job but following the directions is a must.
- #12
- #13
- #14
- #15
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2019
- Messages
- 47
- Reaction score
- 72
- Review score
- +0 /0 /-0
- #16
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2014
- Messages
- 2,451
- Reaction score
- 2,062
- Review score
- +0 /0 /-0
- Location
- Who cares
- #17
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2021
- Messages
- 55
- Reaction score
- 22
- Review score
- +0 /0 /-0
- Location
- tw16 7ql
So how does a bag of carbon in the aquarium flow help the lower of nitrates? Also does it matter how much you put in the bag? I habe 240 L tank thanksThank you so much Lloyd for that I have a better understanding of it now. I just have read so many mixed reviews on running Carbon I wanted to get some peoples input on it. I use RSCP salt and just have read that if I run Carbon it takes out the trace elements from the salt. But you have a very good point. Take it off line when dosing the elements.
- #18
- #19
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2021
- Messages
- 55
- Reaction score
- 22
- Review score
- +0 /0 /-0
- Location
- tw16 7ql
- #20
Similar threads
- Home
- Forums
- General Aquarium Discussion
- Reef Aquarium Discussion
santistevananabrons.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.reef2reef.com/threads/do-you-run-carbon.298638/
0 Response to "Is It Necessary to Run the Filter on a Saltwater Tank Continuously"
Post a Comment